The ministries of Foreign Affairs and the international media, in recent days, focus your batteries in Annapolis, the capital of the State of Maryland, which from next day 27, will host the Middle East peace conference. This event was announced by the occupant of the White House beyond the month of July, when most scientists directed their gaze towards Turkey, scene of the first successful Islamist so-called moderate, bent on Touchup by peaceful means, the secular structures of the Republican building designed in the twenties of the last century by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. President Bush referred in his first speech to the celebration of mere consultations on the situation in the Middle East; the idea of an International Conference was taking shape during the first months of autumn, coinciding with the Secretary of State, Condoleezza Rice, trips to the area. Was the assessment made at that time by the head of American diplomacy rather pessimistic. Rice could verify in situ the myriad of unresolved problems, of contradictory reactions from all parties in the conflict. It was not only the positions of Israel and the national Palestinian Authority (PNA), but also and above all of the multiple reservations made by Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, countries interested in the development of an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement. For Arab statesmen the isolation of Hamas in the Gaza Strip, devised by Israel with the support of United States, constitutes another factor of discord in the already itself unstable regional political landscape. Noted columnist of the rotating Spanish ABC, that the powder keg of Gaza could become the spark for a new conflict with risk of contagion, as happened in Europe in 1914. However, the Bush Administration advocates the presence of fifty Governments and international and regional institutions in the Annapolis meeting, probably shuffling two options: shared success or a failure than the totality of the guests should take. To read more click here: Jack Buckingham.
Tag Archives: home page
In which areas is you harder to be open to learning and declare that you don’t know? 2. In which areas don’t allow you to recognize what you do not know? 3. What are the beliefs that are limiting you? 4. What do you think now is not for you given the person you are? 5. For what do you think you’re not good? 6. In which areas colapsas the judgments about your do with judgments about your being? 7. How much time dedicate you per month to the learning and training? 8. Do you can learn from your mistakes and consider them teachers, or you suffer and you complain believing that there are no outputs and a victim? 9.
In which areas you need to unlearn what they learned? * GET CLOSE TO THE EDGE, THEY SAID; WE ARE AFRAID RESPONDED. Get close to the edge told them, they APPROACHED the LOS pushed and they flew * Guillaume Appollinaire.PASO 4: taking decisions when it takes a decision on what you base? in the facts, experience, in the opinion of others?We often form beliefs and decisions according to what others are saying, or what we see on the internet and in the media. They can be good sources, but you can’t be an experience of second hand. What have these sources done to deserve your trust? When you make a decision, is it really yours? Application period: The next time you take a decision takes two sheets of papel.1.En a of them write down all your experiences on the tema.2.En another writes the opinions of others and everything that you’ve read and heard about the cuestion.3. He then takes the second leaf to the papelera.4. Look again the first worksheet what is your decision, based on your own experience? ** THE challenge is be us them in a world that is trying to us be any other * Renee LocksPASO 5: changing the angle of VISION to what extent is true what we take for granted? To the extent that does not create us satisfaction.