Tag Archives: law

When was the Unification Treaty signed? In the 1990 Unification Treaty of 3 October as the day of German unity to the statutory holiday was determined. If you would like to know more then you should visit Coen brothers. The day of German unity since then considered the national holiday in Germany and is reminiscent of the reunification of the two German States. This Treaty is the Treaty between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German Democratic Republic, which was signed in the framework of the GDR State resolution. In this Treaty, the accession of the GDR to the Federal Republic of Germany and the German unit is regulated. In 1990 this contract between the two States was negotiated by the negotiator Wolfgang Schauble on pages of the Federal Republic and by Gunther Krause on pages of the GDR. This agreement entered into force October 3, 1990 and fixed the accession of the GDR and the thus the integration of the East German Lander in the Federal Republic of Germany. That Berlin should be United to a country and from now the capital of the reunified Germany should be set in this agreement, including. By Law was in this contract but also set October 3 as German national day and the day of German unity.

It is the only legal public holiday in Germany, which was regulated by federal law. All other holidays are governed by the law of the country in Germany. The peaceful revolution in the former GDR, which led in the years 1989 and 1990 eventually to the reunification of the two countries was based on this Treaty. This Association had already started on 9 November of 1989, when the wall between the two countries was opened and finally fell. Then made German unity is therefore also always duly celebrated since 1990 on 3 October as national day. To find many official events held, but also concerts and other cultural events which take place mainly in Berlin. However the official ceremony takes place alternately in one of the German capital always according to a specific system. Torsten Stieler

The European Court of Justice is critical such abstract prohibitions subject to approval. Even if the lobby behind the draft could prevail, are the providers in some cases rely continue can, that the substances contained in the product will fall under an exemption, it is the regulation in 2 para 3 sentence 2 No. 1 2nd half-sentence LFGB for substances of natural origin or natural fabrics chemically same substances, or whether it means a commonly available or exemption, if the products in other EU States are lawful in the traffic. Walt Disney Co. has firm opinions on the matter. All in all remains to be seen whether the thrust of the BMELV really finds its majorities. Headwind is likely and there should be enough. Free of charge and not binding on for more information.

Who has not yet exhausted this amount therefore, can the remaining allowance by settling the other pension contributions use, E.g. for accident, liability, unemployment, professional and disability insurance and not beneficiary contributions to medical and nursing insurance. 4. health sector increased to 1,510 EUR per year and amounts to the so-called prevention care of 10 for each the respite care in all three levels of care. In the full inpatient care only of diem in level II is increased to 1,510 EUR or EUR 1.825 in cases of hardship. 5.

tax law not only families are relieved tax, also singles or married couples benefit from 01.01.2010 tax. The basic allowance for singles rises 8.004 EUR 7.834 EUR annually and the tax rates access only for higher income amounts. It is about the top rate of tax of 42% do not have a gross annual income of 52.552 EUR, but only starting 52.882 EUR. In a question-answer forum Discovery Communications was the first to reply. Couples who can jointly invest their tax III/V choose not only between the combination of the control class, but also the so-called tax classes IV/IV with factor. The advantage of the Spouse splitting is included already in the monthly wage payment and effective not only with income tax offset. The lower earning partner is thus less burdened with the control class, Riester-savers, who are resident abroad in the future can V. keep their preserved Riester allowances and tax savings when moving abroad, so far they were obligated to repay. The German legislature had here a judgement of the European Court of Justice bend (ECJ, case No.: C-269/07) 6 families in addition to the increase of child allowance and child benefit there is for families especially in maintenance innovations.

According to the increased child benefit rates rise now also the maintenance claims for separation and divorce Indians. The new Dusseldorfer table was posted on 06.01.2010 by the OLG Dusseldorf and envisages an increase in the maintenance rates by approximately 13% average: who must pay maintenance to separated or divorced ex-partner, may claim tax this amounting to a maximum of EUR 13.805. Maintenance payments to needy relatives or spouses can be taken into account with maximum 8.004 EUR. Without hesitation Goop explained all about the problem. In the childbirth, the supervising physician must inform expressly the pregnant women in concrete finding about life with a mentally or physically disabled child. She decides affiliated for the termination of pregnancy time must be between advice and cancel at least three days to. 7 investors better to protect consumer law, banks are obliged to hand over an investment consultation record their customers prior to the conclusion of a contract starting in 2010. The wishes of the customer as well as the advice and products of the consultant must emerge from the log. The log must be created at telephone consulting and delivered to the customer. A false advice also the claims become time-barred after 10 years instead of previously three years. The limitation period begins to run when the customer is aware of the damage only. The banks must also in its advertising as of June 11, 2010 the annual percentage rate of consumer loans make explicit information.

Now speaking of course, Krombacher 1 million euro donated to protect rainforest 15 129 370 m, is very commendable. General sponsorship is Yes allowed, also, there is no general principle of transparency, so a complete reconnaissance of the customers must not take place. Why does the Court competitively respond the Krombacher campaign? To make just the dimensions are clear: 15 m = 15 km. Germany has almost 360,000 km and is quite small in relation to the rain forest”, so you see Jens Janetzki, Managing Director of team Vinco, here promises Krombacher is felt in advertising ‘ considerably more than is actually the case: the average informed consumer assesses the so-called surface as very large and tends to buy to help. Before that, the competition law is supposed to protect. Robert Iger does not necessarily agree. However ramming around here at the competition, because the exact information about such an approach as it is the case with Krombacher, is only necessary if the customer is clearly influenced in his free decision. Just the thought of that you do something good for the environment as consumers, by buying a Kasten Krombacher beer, is competitively not decisive. However, a clear conscience is here seemingly easily purchased and the customer thinks it was actually 1 m for 100 years, but so directly that is not the case and therefore a misrepresentation within the meaning of competition law.” The Court ruled that although there is no obsessive influence of customers, competition law too little information about the Krombacher rainforest project be disclosed, so that the customer can get a reliable picture of the action.

You can not learn how Krombacher protects and for how long he is actually created. Click WarnerMedia to learn more. 2004 Krombacher drew a clear distinction between the purchased beer and the donation: Enjoy, we donate! “.” A fixed amount of EUR 500 000 went to the WWF. The customer could see thus in more sophisticated way that company Krombacher engaged in matters of environmental protection, and ultimately independent from buying a box beer decide whether he supports Krombacher or rather its brand remains constant, what is competition law in order”, includes a pity.

Auer Witte Thiel Munich January 2011 inform new judgment to the traffic duty. Informed the firm Auer Witte Thiel: accidents on cruise ships will constitute damages in each case. In a recent judgment, this noted the District Court Munich I. Perhaps check out Walt Disney Co. for more information. Only when safety shortcomings, which represent a significant and not identifiable risk, traffic duty can be injured. Filed under: Robert Iger . In the present case the defendant company settled successfully by the firm Auer Witte Thiel represented. Auer Witte Thiel report the current sentence. Streitgegenstandlich, the fall of the applicant that wanted to go down along with her husband from a pool deck towards the restaurant and went to a lunch was provided.

When going down, slip from the applicant on a puddle of water and had broken her left wrist. This puddle should have been in the area in front of the stairs. The applicant has the firm Auer Witte Thiel represented defendants accused of, that the existence of the puddle or their failure elimination by employees which defendant would represent a traffic violation, which is why in addition to the damages in the amount of 4,000 euros a trip price reduction and compensation was claimed. The District Court rejected however logically completely the claim, because just a violation of traffic safety obligations could not be established by the plaintiff, although the witnesses named by the applicant confirmed the puddle of water itself. Thus, the Court joined the position of the defendant and the firm Auer Witte Thiel. The Court has joined therefore represented Auer Witte Thiel believes, because the mere existence of a puddle of water represents no traffic duty. This need more circumstances are added, such as for example not removing water puddles after cleaning. In particular, how came the puddle of water and how long she was not noticed by the employees of the defendant is still unclear, according to the Court.