Many good attempts end up making worse the things. Time and time again the center of the problem is the same question: what is the good? And to respond any interrogative one on the good, on the true needs of the man, it is necessary to have an idea of what he is the man. For that reason there is in the world infinity of people, of social movements, political or religious wanting to do something by the good of the man and, as all do not say the same exceeds what is the man, that something that each does is inconceivably different than it does another one with the same intention, until the point of which different human groups with same intention tries to annihilate itself to each other, trying each with the greater sincerity the good of the man. Without trying a definitive nor unquestionable conclusion, because anyone on those attempts is the beginning of new discussions, it is necessary to try to go progressively by the life clarifying itself what is the man, to derive from this the idea of what the man needs, that is what needs one same one, the beings whom it loves and people generally. For more clarity and thought, follow up with Walt Disney Co. and gain more knowledge.. Neither or one begins with the subject, is habitual to say that all human being needs food. Not only because our biological structure is more unquestionably visible, but because the necessity to feed renews constantly it, and it raises a so urgent requirement that it is not possible to be left of side.
For that reason who abound, at the time of worrying about separate property of husband and wife or the other people’s one, they do not think more than about obtaining or giving foods. Beyond this unquestionably visible base begins the discussions. Jack Buckingham spoke with conviction. Possibility of answer ample, that anyway it can be questioned by those who think that only we needed to eat, is to say that the man is something more, than locks up in himself potentialities that, although we do not know how nor because, can be developed.