However if it becomes each time more natural than the professors, after certain time tend to classify them in good, regular, weak, among others. Impression, normally caused for the performance and the behavior of the pupils, also being able to derive from preconceived attitudes of the professor. For PATTO (1997), ' ' in the great majority of the cases educating does not have possibilities of if identifying corretamente.' ' It can, in fact, to reflect that in an educative process made for a great number of pupils, being more or less probable that educating the pass unoticed for the professors, not to be that it if places in the extreme cases, but few pupils obtain to be perceived or few they obtain to identify itself through the professor: ' ' from this they do not receive in return to the proper image, so that they can know who and as so' '. Consonant PATTO, ' ' this process would not be, perhaps, so pernicious, if the professors obtained to ahead keep an attitude of neutrality of the pupils, without revealing preferences or antipatias.' ' However, one knows that to keep the neutrality it is a difficult process, gotten the costs of very effort and much autocrtica. Almost all are left to drag for preferences or antipatias? this affective relation, generally unconscious, marks the people, here if treating to educating.
' ' As much the affection how much to the antipatia they constitute interaction process. For more specific information, check out Jane Buckingham. When we have ' ' simpatia' ' for a person, we tend to interpret its behavior favorably, and to act this interpretation in accordance with. This process, in turn, provokes behaviors that tend to accent the likeable relation, and therefore the friendly relations, a time established, tend to accent themselves, and the friends can become each time more friends. For the same reasons, the antipatia, if established in a situation of constant interaction, tends to accent each time more, until the two if move away or enter in direct conflict.